Source: Cato Institute
by Brandan P Buck

“Over the last eight weeks of war with Iran, America’s two deliberative institutions, Congress and the media, have largely abandoned their duty to sustain public debate on the most important question a republic can face — the choice between war and peace. Neither institution performed perfectly during the Global War on Terror. Yet on Capitol Hill there was debate before the initiation of hostilities, and the media made considerable efforts to manufacture consent. By today’s standard, these activities seem almost admirable. The Iran War may be the first genuinely ‘post-deliberative’ war in American history.” (05/01/26)

https://www.cato.org/commentary/americas-post-deliberative-wars

Source: The American Prospect
by Robert Kuttner

“In Louisiana v. Callais, the Roberts Court has continued its war on civil rights [sic] in the name of civil rights. The cynicism of the 6-3 majority decision in Callais is staggering. According to the majority decision by Justice Samuel Alito, the long-standing interpretation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, requiring minorities to have opportunities to have representation in rough proportion to their population, has been overtaken by events. What has changed? Nothing, except Alito’s ability to cobble together a majority based on his disingenuous [sic] claim that this ruling is merely an ‘update.’ As recently as the Court’s 2023 ruling in Allen v. Milligan, Justices John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh voted to uphold a lower-court order requiring an additional majority-minority district in Alabama.” [editor’s note: Fascinating how the Dramacrat narrative has so entirely overwhelmed “progressive” pundit thought on this issue – SAT] (05/01/26)

https://prospect.org/2026/05/01/turning-civil-rights-inside-out-supreme-court-voting-rights/

Source: Ludwig von Mises Institute
by Joshua Mawhorter

“Many who do not understand markets, the division of labor, production, exchange, and profit—whether willingly or unwillingly—see no justification for unequal wealth and income because inequality can only result from nefarious activity or random luck. Many mock Adam Smith’s ‘invisible hand,’ but they themselves seem to believe that another invisible hand of random luck or chance unevenly distributes benefits and deficits such that greater wealth and income are illegitimate. This invisible hand of luck is also determinative to the point that it is independent of purposeful action. Therefore, those who think this way want the very visible hand of the state to rearrange wealth in a way that makes sense to them since the invisible hand of luck distributed wealth unequally.” (05/01/26)

https://mises.org/mises-wire/why-luck-doesnt-explain-wealth-and-success-marketplace

Source: Wired
by Steven Levy

“Here’s a reality check: Since the only way to verify Satoshi’s identity is to get the unique cryptographic key linked to the 1.1 million bitcoins in their wallet, the best anyone can do is create a compelling circumstantial case. To really close the book, your evidence must be so powerful that it would convince even those who have gone before you and squandered months of their lives in the quest. … Projects to unmask Satoshi have a kabuki-style familiarity. They’re crypto-journalistic versions of Clue, the Agatha Christie-esque board game where players identify a murderer from a fixed set of suspects.” (05/01/26)

https://archive.is/mYbN7

Source: EconLog
by Jeffrey Shelton Hummel

“While she recognizes that there is a relationship between the Fed’s target interest rate and the growth rate of the money supply, she has a highly exaggerated view of the Fed’s broader ability to affect market interest rates. She buys into the fallacy, widespread not only among the general public but also among many public-policy pundits, that the Fed has tight control over nearly all market interest rates.” (05/01/26)

https://www.econlib.org/library/columns/y2026/hummelgold

Source: David Friedman’s Substack
by David Friedman

“Some people are born with bad hearts, some good. As long as nobody knows which is which it is possible to insure against the risk of having a bad heart. What happens if a genetic test is invented that distinguishes people who are likely to have a heart attack from people who are not?” (05/01/26)

https://daviddfriedman.substack.com/p/how-knowing-more-can-make-us-worse