Source: The Hill
by Max Burns

“Millions of Americans were willing to ignore Trump’s destructive personality and growing authoritarianism when they thought his policies would make them rich. In the end, those policies did little more than pick their pockets while enriching Trump’s inner circle of family and friends. The voters who elected him are left to pick up the pieces of their derailed lives as they come to terms with the fact that they were the rubes all along. It’s no wonder his biggest supporters feel duped. … MAGA voters have long believed in taking Trump ‘seriously but not literally.’ This is just another way of saying Trump might lie to other people to advance his own interests, but he would never lie to the supporters who power his political movement. At least some of those faithful Trump supporters are finally ready to admit that they’ve been conned, and there’s no way back to believing the fairy tale.” (04/22/26)

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/5841668-maga-infighting-trump-carlson/

Source: Town Hall
by Gregory Lyakhov

“The United States was built on a distrust of concentrated power. It is this fundamental distrust of big government that shaped federalism, defined the separation of powers, and limited each branch to a distinct role. During periods of rapid social change, however, governmental restraint weakens. Reform movements (whether in civil rights, economic regulation, or cultural policy) have not only produced legislation but also expanded judicial authority. Social progressivism brings courts to no longer just interpret the law but also reshape it. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 addressed a clear injustice. It prohibited discrimination in employment and public accommodations based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Congress enacted the law through the democratic process, responding to a national failure to enforce equal protection. While many conservatives criticize the Act’s expansion of federal authority, it came through elected representatives.” (04/22/26)

https://townhall.com/columnists/gregory-lyakhov/2026/04/22/why-social-change-typically-limits-democracy-n2674846

Source: David Friedman’s Substack
by David Friedman

“One way of choosing among different forms of punishment is by how much it costs to impose a given cost on the criminal. Consider first execution. The cost to the criminal is one life. That is also, if we ignore the salary of the hangman or the electric bill for the electric chair, both trivial in comparison, the total cost, so the ratio of total cost to amount of deterrence is about one. The same would be true for a corporal punishment such as a flogging. Next consider imprisonment, one of the two common forms of criminal punishment in modern societies.” (04/22/26)

https://daviddfriedman.substack.com/p/the-case-against-efficient-punishment

Source: Niskanen Center
by Shriya Garg

“The one-year anniversary of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) has renewed attention to the financial stability of rural hospitals. The sweeping legislation made significant changes to Medicaid funding and eligibility, effects of which are still coming into focus for rural facilities. But the OBBBA is only the latest chapter in a longer story. The structural forces most responsible for rural hospitals’ financial precarity predate the law by decades.” (04/22/26)

https://www.niskanencenter.org/how-the-medicare-wage-index-disadvantages-rural-areas

Source: Christian Science Monitor
by staff

“For the first time since World War II, Japanese combat troops are participating in live-fire, land-and-sea military exercises in an Asian country that was once under the harsh rule of imperial Japan. On Monday, some 1,400 Japanese soldiers joined with the forces of a few other democracies around the Pacific to practice mock battles for 19 days in the northern Philippines – not far from China and the islands it forcibly claims in the South China Sea. … For Japan, this overseas training under real-world conditions marks a historic turning point for its postwar pacifist tradition and its heavy reliance on the United States for external defense. Yet, on a larger scale, it puts on display a long-term effort by many Asian democracies and their Western partners to define the meaning of shared security, preferably the kind that cannot be seen as ganging up on China.” (04/21/26)

https://www.csmonitor.com/Editorials/the-monitors-view/2026/0421/Asia-s-expanding-circle-of-security