Source: Ludwig von Mises Institute
by Luc Lelièvre

“Digital surveillance promises to make institutions more secure by enabling them to see more. Automated license-plate readers, facial recognition systems, and interconnected databases allow authorities to identify patterns and retrieve information at speeds once considered impossible. Yet greater capacity to detect and classify does not necessarily improve the ability to determine what happened. An institution may acquire more information without gaining the ability to interpret it accurately. The distinction matters because surveillance does more than collect information. Its outputs can initiate investigations, influence decisions, and authorize interventions that affect people who have little control over how the information is interpreted. The central problem is not merely that surveillance systems sometimes make mistakes. Rather, an institution can transform an uncertain indication into an apparently established fact through the very procedures the indication sets in motion.” (11/10/26)

https://mises.org/mises-wire/paradox-digital-security-when-surveillance-creates-insecurity-it-claims-solve

Source: Caitlin Johnstone, Rogue Journalist
by Caitlin Johnstone

“I keep thinking about a talk I listened to by Julian Assange back in 2017 where he warned that one day AI could be used to facilitate the propaganda interests of the powerful by manipulating news media and information in ways that are too subtle for the human mind to notice. Assange described a future where AI-powered algorithms serve us a customized feed of information based on data collected about our search queries and interests, calculated to appeal to our biases and construct a worldview for us which advances the agendas of those who control the machines. He explained that sufficiently advanced artificial intelligence systems could arrange this information with more subtlety and complexity than human perception can pick up on, in much the same way a computer can outperform any human brain at a game of chess.” (11/10/26)

https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2026/11/10/they-want-to-use-ai-to-re-centralize-control-of-information/

Source: Garrison Center
by Thomas L Knapp

“Various polls show the public broadly in support of ending the ‘spring forward / fall back’ nonsense, but not necessarily in agreement on whether the standard should be ‘Standard Time’ or ‘Daylight Saving Time.’ I’ve seen good arguments from both sides. My own position is: Pick one and make it happen. For whatever reason, such measures always seem to bog down in Congress. Unable to decide which direction to go in, they always end up punting and putting us through another year of those annoying clock changes. There’s a third way for Congress to go about exercising its Article 1, Section 8 power to ‘fix the standard of weights and measures’ that’s simple and sensible.” (11/10/26)

https://thegarrisoncenter.org/archives/21022

Source: Future of Freedom Foundation
by Jacob G Hornberger

“In the aftermath of the midterm elections, while virtually all of the focus is on the Iran war and soaring prices, we mustn’t forget that immigration was another major reason for the political massacre of Republican candidates at the hands of the Democrats. Specifically, after overwhelmingly going for Trump just two years ago in the 2024 presidential election, Hispanics switched course in the midterms and returned to the Democrats. … as I have been emphasizing for 36 years here at The Future of Freedom Foundation, there is one — and only one — solution to the decades-old, ongoing, never-ending immigration morass. That solution is open borders — the abolition of ICE, the Border Patrol, and all restrictions on the free movements of people across the U.S.-Mexico border and, more generally, into and out of the United States.” (11/10/26)

https://www.fff.org/2026/11/10/immigration-was-another-reason-for-the-republican-massacre/

Source: Jonathan Turley Blog
by Jonathan Turley

“In Mullin v. Friends of Ruidosa Church, the Supreme Court just lifted the injunction on the Administration’s effort to go forward with the completion of a border wall through the Big Bend region of West Texas. The issue should not be the policy merits. There are good-faith arguments against the wall in such areas. Indeed, outgoing Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) wrote an op-ed against the project. However, the sole question before the Court was the authority of a president to order the construction and use of statutory waivers to do so. Eight out of nine justices voted that ‘the Government is exceedingly likely to prevail on its argument that the District Court lacked jurisdiction.’ Once again, the sole holdout was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who did not explain her position.” (11/10/26)

https://jonathanturley.org/2026/11/10/mullin-over-the-separation-of-powers-justice-jackson-again-stands-alone/