“Trump personifies his own movement, so perhaps he has the prerogative of redefining it. But ‘regime change’ from Tehran to Moscow has little in common with non-interventionism. And if the U.S. was devoted to keeping ‘lunatics’ from enriching uranium for a nuke, North Korea and Pakistan (where Osama Bin Laden hung out) wouldn’t have one. No, this is ‘regime change,’ and whatever side you may be on and however you parse it, it’s at odds with a whole lot of Trump supporters. The only thing that those of us who harbor doubts about it can say is, ‘I hope he’s right.’ Because if he’s not, the midterms are finished — and so is America First.” (03/06/26)
Source: The American Prospect
by Whitney Curry Wimbish
“House lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee debated a proposal Thursday that would force state and local police to help federal agents conduct deportations or risk losing federal funding. Not only would it essentially hold local jurisdictions hostage, Democratic lawmakers said, it also violates states’ rights. The bill, the Shut Down Sanctuary Policies Act, aims to punish Los Angeles, New York, and other cities that have policies limiting cooperation with federal agents, such as restrictions on honoring ICE detainers, providing access to jails, and sharing information about individuals’ immigration status. These cities have been in the crosshairs of the Trump administration for months; Attorney General Pam Bondi last year published a hit list of sanctuary jurisdictions, saying they cause risk to American citizens ‘by design’.” (03/06/26)
“When the Trump administration demanded changes to Anthropic’s AI system and backed it up with a threat to seize the system or blacklist the company, the message was clear: comply or be crushed. But cut through the rhetoric and the real question is whether Washington can bankrupt a company for saying no to the Pentagon. Though the media is busy framing this as a national security showdown, it actually poses a constitutional concern. It is a test of whether the federal government can weaponize its contracting power to force a private company to bend the knee.” (03/06/26)
“Rothbard is surely right that, by definition, in a country or world of private property, the owners would set the rules for their own parcels, leaving others to shop around for situations that best suit their values. But let’s be clear here. It would not be the case that no one could enter a property ‘unless invited,’ as he put it in the first quotation above. Walmart does not invite particular people to its stores. Neither does McDonald’s. They have open borders during business hours. It’s a standing invitation to everyone and anyone who’s peaceful. So the word ‘invited’ is misleading.” (03/06/26)
“California lets interest groups propose measures for the state ballot. Anyone who gathers enough signatures (currently 874,641) can put their hare-brained plans before voters during the next election year. This year, the big story is the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act, a 5% wealth tax on California’s billionaires. … On one level, it’s no surprise that California, a state full of bad socialists, is considering bad socialist policy. But I think this is the wrong perspective. This proposition isn’t being sponsored by some generic group of Piketty-reading leftists. It’s the project of SEIU (Service Employees International Union) a union of mostly healthcare workers.” (03/06/26)
“The Middle East is on fire, the planet on the verge of world war, the Homeland Security director just ousted. It’d hard to pay attention to anything else. Still, if you want to know why news that the FBI has begun to turn over long-concealed ‘prohibited access’ files to Congress might matter, just ask Seymour Hersh. Fifty-two years ago, on December 21, 1974, the famed muckraker printed ‘Huge C.I.A. Operation Reported in U.S. Against Antiwar Forces, Other Dissidents In Nixon Years’ in the New York Times. … These misdeeds were part of a trove of dirty secrets in the CIA’s past that came to be known as the agency’s ‘Family Jewels.’ Some sources Racket spoke with this week recalled the case in conjunction with news about the discovery of a cache of secret files at the FBI.” (03/06/26)
“Donald Trump’s attack on Iran will have many unintended and unforeseen consequences. One consequence even I wasn’t thinking about, but which is already clear after less than a week, is that Trump has made a strong new case for renewable energy. The usual argument for promoting solar and wind power is that relying on renewable energy avoids the environmental damage caused by burning fossil fuels. This environmental damage includes, but isn’t limited to, climate change. In addition, air pollution imposes shockingly large direct and immediate costs by harming our health and reducing our life expectancy.” (03/06/26)
