Australia’s Tobacco Taxes Have Sparked a Criminal Turf War

Source: The Daily Economy
by Jeffrey L Degner

“Australia tried to end smoking with punitive taxes. Instead, it created a lucrative trade for smugglers and a wave of violent attacks on retailers.” (10/13/26)

https://thedailyeconomy.org/article/australias-tobacco-taxes-have-sparked-a-criminal-turf-war/

Why British liberals need the Russian bogeyman

Source: UnHerd
by Thomas Fazi

“Since the 2016 Russiagate fiasco, it has become standard practice among Western elites, especially in Europe, to blame every unwelcome election result — and above all every ‘populist’ rebuke to their rule — on Russian ‘disinformation’ and ‘interference’. The campaign has escalated dramatically since 2022. We are told that Russia has for years been running a vast influence operation aimed at manipulating helpless voters. Yet the evidence that this operation has reached, let alone swayed, any meaningful number of them is scant to say the least.” (10/12/26)

https://archive.is/6oEA8

Where in the World Was James Talarico?

Source: Town Hall
by Derek Hunter

“The bowl-cut leftist in Texas, James Talarico, came off the milk carton and returned to the world of the living over the weekend. Where he was remains a mystery, as does why he was gone. What isn’t a mystery is why the corporate media didn’t really cover the story much or question anything related to a candidate in the highest-profile Senate election in the country disappearing for almost two weeks. The ‘official story’ is that Talarico, a very odd person to begin with, simply had the flu. I’ve had the flu, and it’s not fun. It also doesn’t put people in bed for two weeks and rob you of the ability to make any public appearances, if only via video chat. … Was he at a mental health facility for inpatient treatment after a breakdown?” [editor’s note: Obviously not, or he and Hunter would likely have been roomies – TLK] (10/13/26)

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2026/10/13/where-in-the-world-was-james-talarico-n2684552

Private Prosecutors

Source: Law & Liberty
by Cory L Andrews

“Civil society, for Locke, begins with a surrender. In the state of nature, anyone may punish a wrong done to the community. In society, that power passes to a common authority, and only the sovereign may avenge public wrongs. Blackstone put the same idea in the language of the common law: private wrongs are the injured party’s to redress, public wrongs are the Crown’s. The Framers absorbed the distinction and gave it a specific constitutional home: ‘The executive Power,’ Article II begins, ‘shall be vested in a President.’ One pocket of private prosecution, however, survives that settlement. … Under the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions, a private plaintiff or ‘relator’—with no injury of her own, no office, and no constitutional oath—may sue in the name of the United States, litigate the government’s claim, and keep up to 30 percent of what she recovers.” (10/13/26)

https://lawliberty.org/private-prosecutors/

Wealth Taxes, Socialist Ideology, and Absent Economics

Source: Independent Institute
by Nikolai G Wenzel

“In these times of runaway public debt and perennial crisis in public finances, the wealth tax is a bad idea that just won’t go away. Just a year ago, the prudent Swiss rejected a steep inheritance tax. France—thanks to political machinations in a hung Parliament, rather than deep conviction or prudence—rejected the resuscitation of its failed wealth taxes (1982-1987 and 1989-2012). The UK floated a similar proposal, which went nowhere. Since 2022, Spain has had a ‘temporary solidarity tax on big fortunes’. Alas, this isn’t just a European game. … Perhaps the main problem is that bad policy proposals are being driven by bad economics, with the imprimatur of high-profile scholars.” (10/12/260

https://www.independent.org/article/2026/10/12/wealth-tax-economics-gabriel-zucman-billionaires-2026/

The Senate’s Surprisingly Populist Permitting Reform Deal

Source: Washington Monthly
by Kainoa Lowman

“In September, after months of negotiations and to much fanfare, a bipartisan group of senators introduced a major package of energy reforms. The Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act (BAAJA) has been enthusiastically championed by luminaries of the ‘Abundance’ movement, since parts of the bill would ease regulatory bottlenecks that hinder new energy projects. Economic populists on the left have not embraced the bill in the same way, though they should. BAAJA would take meaningful steps to prevent unpopular corporate interests—namely, utility companies—from hindering the transition to cheaper, cleaner energy sources.” (10/13/26)

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2026/10/13/the-senates-surprisingly-populist-permitting-reform-deal/

Eric Ueland Shouldn’t Lead the Government Accountability Office

Source: Exiled Policy
by Jason Pye

“Congress shouldn’t need a lecture on why putting Russ Vought’s deputy in charge of its watchdog is a terrible idea. Well, here we are. The White House is considering Eric Ueland as comptroller general, head of the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Ueland serves as deputy director for management at the Office of Management and Budget, under Vought. The administration whose conduct GAO has repeatedly found unlawful now wants one of its senior officials to run the institution that scrutinizes that conduct. This is a terrible idea.” (10/12/260

https://exiledpolicy.substack.com/p/eric-ueland-shouldnt-lead-the-government

A Nobel for New Keynesian macro, at last!

Source: Noahpinion
by Noah Smith

“First, let me say that this prize is long overdue. In 2009, I asked my PhD advisor, Miles Kimball, who was the greatest living macroeconomist. Without hesitation, he answered ‘Bob Hall’, and said he would be very surprised if Hall didn’t win the Nobel at some point. Hall’s work is breathtakingly broad; if you want good summaries, I recommend Alex Tabarrok and Tyler Cowen (as usual). As for Michael Woodford, everyone I know assumed that if New Keynesian macro ever did get the prize, Woodford would be included, as he literally wrote the book on it. But anyway, let’s talk about New Keynesian economics — what it is, how it came about, why it’s important, and why it didn’t get a Nobel until now.” (10/13/26)

https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/a-nobel-for-new-keynesian-macro-at

Make Big Brother Bad for Big Business

Source: The Atlantic
by Conor Friedersdorf

“[M]ost of Flock’s network and its competitors’ cameras remain in place. And fans of the technology want to keep it that way; they argue that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy on roads, and that a network of cameras that logs every passing vehicle is a vital tool for catching criminals. Most surveillance boosters don’t deny that serious abuses have happened or wholly dismiss privacy concerns. Instead, they urge the use of safeguards and the passage of regulations to address them. But this technology is already ubiquitous. States and localities should not permit its dangers to persist in the hope that one day, our often passive legislators will act. Instead, Americans should work to ban mass surveillance of public roads in every jurisdiction where they can secure support from elected officials until strong protections are in place.” (10/12/26)

https://archive.is/9Xmge

Time to De-Privatize?

Source: The American Prospect
by Robert Kuttner

“Last week, I published a piece on a private company called ID.me, which has over a billion dollars in contracts with federal and state agencies to provide secure identification when citizens do digital transactions with government agencies. Because this company is a dot-me rather than a dot-com, several readers wrote me to say that they had just assumed it was part of the government. Over 150 million Americans now have ID.me accounts, which are required to access several government agencies. ID.me has a policy of never selling data. But that’s not the problem. The problem is that allowing citizens to access government agencies is a necessary government function. As I wrote, contracting out that function deprives the government of core competence, and the dependence on for-profit vendors grows over time.” [editor’s not4e: I added the “?” to make this a discussion, instead of the assertion of the socialist pundit – SAT] (10/13/26)

https://prospect.org/2026/10/13/time-to-de-privatize-federal-government/