Israel’s Smotrich Approves New Squat in Attempt to “Bury” State of Palestine

Source: US News & World Report

“Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich approved plans overnight for a [squat] that would split [occupied] East Jerusalem from the occupied West Bank, a move his office said would bury the idea of a Palestinian state. It was not immediately clear if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu backed the plan to revive the long-frozen E1 scheme, which Palestinians and world powers have said would effectively lop the West Bank in two and will likely draw international ire. … Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand imposed sanctions in June on Smotrich and another far-right minister who advocates for [squat] expansion, accusing both of them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.” (08/14/25)

https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2025-08-14/israels-smotrich-approves-settlement-splitting-east-jerusalem-from-west-bank

Why the Supreme Court is Highly Unlikely to Overturn Obergefell in the Kim Davis Case

Source: The Volokh Conspiracy
by Ilya Somin

“[Davis’s] case has multiple flaws as a potential vehicle for the Obergefell issue. Among other things, that question is an appendage to a dubious religious-liberty claim, under which Davis claims that government officials have a First Amendment right to refuse to issue marriage licenses to couples they disapprove of on religious grounds. It’s worth noting, here, that some people have religious objections to interracial marriages and interfaith marriages, among other possibilities. Does a clerk with religious objections have a constitutional right to refuse to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple or to one involving an intermarriage between a Jew and a Christian? The question answers itself. … In the private sector, I think there often is a First Amendment free speech or religious liberty right to refuse to provide services …. Public employees engaged in their official duties are a very different matter.” (08/13/25)

https://reason.com/volokh/2025/08/13/why-the-supreme-court-is-highly-unlikely-to-overturn-obergefell-in-the-kim-davis-case/

Russia: Ukrainian drone strikes hit two cities, injuring at least 16

Source: Malay Mail [Malaysia]

“Ukrainian drones struck two Russian cities on Thursday in attacks that injured at least 16 people, local authorities said, a day before a US-Russia summit on the war in Ukraine. Thirteen people were wounded, two seriously, when a drone struck an apartment building in the southern Russian city of Rostov-on-Don …. Three civilians were wounded in the city of Belgorod …. Separately, the head of Russia’s Volgograd region said fallen debris from Ukrainian drones had caused a fire at an oil refinery.” (08/14/25)

https://www.malaymail.com/news/world/2025/08/14/ukrainian-drone-strikes-hit-two-russian-cities-injuring-at-least-16-ahead-of-us-russia-summit/187628

Government should become extinct

Source: Eastern New Mexico News
by Kent McManigal

“Government is an unnecessary evil. Every government, not just the ones you dislike. The governments you are encouraged to hate are no worse than the one you look to for advice on which ones to hate. In fact, they are less harmful to you since they aren’t able to rule or tax you. People who try to justify government often admit it’s evil. Thomas Paine, in his pamphlet Common Sense from 1776, wrote, ‘Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.’ This doesn’t hold water. If something is evil, it’s not necessary, and if it’s necessary, it can’t be evil. It’s like arguing for a square circle. It’s one or the other, and government is always intolerable.” (08/13/25)

https://www.easternnewmexiconews.com/story/2025/08/13/voices/opinion-government-should-become-extinct/231446.html

Appeals court lets Trump regime suspend or end billions in foreign aid

Source: SFGate

“A divided panel of appeals court judges ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration can suspend or terminate billions of dollars of congressionally appropriated funding for foreign aid. Two of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that grant recipients challenging the freeze did not meet the requirements for a preliminary injunction restoring the flow of money. In January, on the first day of his second term in the White House, Republican President Donald Trump issued an executive order directing the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development to freeze spending on foreign aid. After groups of grant recipients sued to challenge that order, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to release the full amount of foreign assistance that Congress had appropriated for the 2024 budget year. The appeal court’s majority partially vacated Ali’s order.” (08/13/25)

https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/appeals-court-lets-the-white-house-suspend-or-end-20815922.php

Judicial Deference to Unconstitutional Actions

Source: Future of Freedom Foundation
by Jacob G Hornberger

“When the U.S. Constitution called the federal government into existence, it was on the condition that federal officials could exercise only those powers that the Constitution delegated to the federal government. If a power wasn’t delegated, it could not be exercised. … The responsibility of the judicial branch was to determine whether laws enacted by Congress or actions taken by the president were constitutional or not. The federal judiciary would have the final say over the constitutionality of laws and actions. … after the federal government was converted to a national-security state in the late 1940s, the national-security establishment (i.e., the Pentagon, the CIA, and the NSA) effectively became a fourth branch of government — and the most powerful branch at that, one to which the other three branches ended up deferring.” (08/13/25)

https://www.fff.org/2025/08/13/judicial-deference-to-unconstitutional-actions/

Newsom: California regime will redraw maps after “missed” Trump deadline

Source: The Hill

“California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said Tuesday that his state would redraw its House maps after President Trump failed to respond to a letter the governor sent him urging Trump to have red states call off redistricting efforts. ‘DONALD ‘TACO’ TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, ‘MISSED’ THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE ‘BEAUTIFUL MAPS,’ THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!),’ Newsom wrote in a statement on the social platform X put out through his press office, meant to mock how Trump writes his posts on Truth Social. … Newsom penned a letter to Trump on Monday pressing the president to have Texas and other red states stop their mid-decade redistricting efforts …. Newsom’s office gave Trump until Tuesday evening to reply to the letter.” (08/13/25)

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5449851-newsom-trump-redistricting-clash/

Inflation or recession? Either way, Trump’s tariffs will leave lasting scars.

Source: The Hill
by Sheldon H Jacobson

“Tariffs will create a new market equilibrium. Higher prices will invariably shift consumer preferences and buying patterns. Given that consumers tend to be price sensitive, they may chase lower prices for the same goods by purchasing different brands, opt to purchase different goods (for example, switching from beef to chicken), or simply not make purchases. The net effect is less consumer spending, which invariably will lead to a shrinking economy. Recent GDP and labor force numbers support this trend, which will only accelerate as the tariffs become more widespread and ingrained into the economy.” (08/13/25)

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/5448330-trump-tariffs-economic-scars/

Why We Must Release the Epstein Files

Source: The Nation
by US Representative Rho Khanna (D-CA)

“On his podcast, Joe Rogan recently asked Senator Bernie Sanders a question that reflects a concern many Americans have today: Why should people pay more in taxes to ‘an incompetent, corrupt government’ that lacks accountability? The truth is, we should be investing more in government programs for education, healthcare, and the creation of well-paid jobs. But decades of corruption and the unchecked influence of money in politics have fueled a deep distrust in our institutions. Overcoming this distrust is one of our greatest challenges as a country. If we want to enact initiatives like a 21st-century Marshall Plan for America or Medicare for All, we need people to believe that government works for them — not just for the rich and powerful.” [editor’s note: Rho Khanna is a multi-millionaire congresscritter. Rich? Check. Powerful? Check – TLK] (08/13/25)

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/epstein-files-trump-transparency-corruption/