“A weather person who told us to bundle up for the cold weather, but also be sure to drink plenty of fluids to protect against the heat, would not be taken very seriously. That is roughly the state of economics when it comes to basic demographic questions. On alternate days the economy seems to be suffering from too many people and too few people. Yet people somehow still take economists seriously on this issue.” (03/30/26)
Source: Ludwig von Mises Institute
by George Ford Smith
“Nock was persuaded by Franz Oppenheimer’s theory that people acquire wealth in one of two ways: either through work and exchange or theft. The first, Oppenheimer called the economic means, the second, the political means. States are the manifestation of the political means, the embodiment of a predatory class that coercively feeds off and controls its productive captives. Within the American state the occupants change periodically, and many people believe the troubles we’re experiencing are due to voting the wrong people into office. Better people would produce better government. There are several shortcomings to this idea.” (03/30/26)
“There is nothing more infuriating to a frustrated air traveler delayed for hours by the Democrat shutdown than to see senators strolling smugly by with VIP escorts. The worst offender last week was Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who hightailed it out of DC on Friday morning, hours after stitching up a duplicitous 2 a.m. deal to end the shutdown by caving to Democrat demands to defund ICE and border enforcement, at least for the time being. Elements of the Department of Homeland Security were funded in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year, but Thune’s deal freezes out immigration enforcement and border security functions that are all-important as we go to war against the world’s largest sponsor of Islamic terrorism.” (03/29/26)
“For much of the 20th and 21st centuries, calls for an enemy’s total capitulation have carried enormous symbolic power in U.S. political culture. ‘Unconditional surrender’ seems to promise a total and morally unambiguous victory. Crucially, the power of the narrative does not end with surrender. In its most compelling form, it extends into a transformative vision of defeated societies not only accepting their losses but being liberated and remade in the American image, emerging as stable, prosperous democracies. In practice, however, even the most decisive military victories seldom translate into anything resembling the absolute defeat of a country’s body politic, its bureaucratic institutions, or its underlying ideological foundations, all of which tend instead to endure, adapt, and reconstitute themselves in ways that complicate the finality promised by the language of unconditional surrender.” (03/30/26)
Source: Antiwar.com
by Ramzy Baroud & Romana Rubeo
“Dimona is not an ordinary town. It lies adjacent to the Negev Nuclear Research Center, widely understood to be central to Israel’s nuclear weapons program. Located deep in the Naqab desert, the facility has long been treated as one of Israel’s most sensitive strategic sites, associated with plutonium production and long-term weapons capability. That context gives the strike its meaning. The Iranian attack on Dimona came hours after a renewed US-Israeli strike on Iran’s Natanz nuclear facility earlier the same day. … The sequence is not incidental. Natanz was struck in the morning; Dimona was hit later the same day. Even without an exact hour-by-hour timeline, the proximity establishes a clear operational logic: a nuclear facility in Iran is answered with a nuclear-adjacent site in Israel within hours.” (03/30/26)
“President Donald Trump’s war on Iran is almost a month old, and, as expected, the countries most affected are the six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The question now is whether these six governments will see no other option but to risk all by entering the military fight alongside the U.S. and Israel.” (03/30/26)
“President Donald Trump launched the Iran war based on his ‘gut instinct’. Global financial markets (the North Star that guides Trump) are telling him what his advisers and congressional Republicans won’t: His ‘gut’ blew it badly, and his efforts to appease the markets are making the debacle worse. He has proceeded in three phases. We’re now at the Trump panic phase. Phase No. 1: Trump’s Gut Was Wrong and the Markets Scolded Him. Trump ignored the facts and relied on gut instinct to launch the war without making the case to America’s allies or the public. … Trump’s baseless opinion contradicted the justification for war that Secretary of State Marco Rubio had provided to Congress a day earlier. Rubio said that Israel was going to attack and that Iran would retaliate by attacking US interests in the region.” (03/30/26)
