“When speaking of Democratic Party politicians, the answer to the question in the title is very easy: they are just pure evil. Some of them, yes, do fall into the other categories as well, but the people who advocate and urge evil (more on that in a moment) are evil. And every Democrat politician supports incredibly, vile, evil things. But when we are talking about the various people who vote for the Democrats, the motives and rationales are not always so uncomplicated. I base this article on a recent Breitbart headline: ‘Democrat Who Said Trump Supporters Belong in Concentration Camps on Track to Win North Caroline House Seat’. This is, of course, appalling, horrifying, revolting, and, yes, pure, 100% evil. There is no other word for it.” (11/11/26)
“It is Veterans Day again, which means that, alongside the free red, white, and blue pancake specials and complimentary coffees, Americans will post tributes honoring the ultimate sacrifice of our soldiers. Just as predictably, on Memorial Day, veterans will receive well-intentioned messages thanking them for their service. Of course, Memorial Day honors those who died while serving in the U.S. military, whereas Veterans Day recognizes all who have served. This confusion is hardly something to get worked up about in itself. But it is symptomatic of something more consequential: a nation detached from its military and the wars it fights.” (11/11/26)
“The US House of Representatives on Tuesday night, with a 211 to 204 margin, voted to refer the impeachment charges against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to a committee, allowing Republicans to slow the process so that the current Congress would not be able to take them up. There are procedural options that would allow impeachment to be brought up again, but these are very unlikely. The political reality is that Hegseth will continue as Defense Secretary for the near future. Indeed, the House’s failure to impeach Hegseth only builds his political capital with President Donald Trump. As expected, House Republicans closed ranks behind Hegseth. What was not expected was that 11 House Democrats failed to show up to vote. If you do the simple arithmetic, it is clear that had the Democrats showed up the House would have been able to consider the impeachment charges against Hegseth.” (11/11/26)
“President Donald Trump, after threatening for weeks to bring the ‘hammer’ down on Iran, said Monday that a U.S. escalation is ‘unlikely’ and the war is ‘effectively over’ militarily. Antiwar voices breathed sighs of relief, and oil prices continued to plunge amid surging hopes of lasting peace. But there’s a big problem. Trump also says he’ll maintain America’s crushing economic pressure campaign against Tehran, including the naval blockade on Iranian ports. Not only is the blockade itself an act of war under international law, but the campaign makes a resumption of all-out hostilities more likely, regardless of the president’s intentions, experts told The American Conservative.” (11/11/26)
“A faculty group calling itself ‘Uncivil’ recently criticized the people leading civility and pluralism programs that encourage college students to engage constructively across lines of difference on campus. I’m one of those program leaders. As the founder of the nation’s largest interfaith organization, Interfaith America, I’ve visited over 200 college campuses promoting pluralism—the conviction that people with different identities and divergent ideologies can respect one another, build relationships, and cooperate for the common good. The students we serve span the ideological spectrum. They might disagree profoundly about the Middle East, abortion, and religion, but they can still agree to work alongside people whose convictions differ from their own.” (11/11/26)
“There was an orderly process for admitting immigrants at Ellis Island. But immigrants who showed up at Ellis Island did not need an invitation—or permission—to do so. All they needed was a ticket on a ship going to New York City. … The arrival of[Stephen] Miller’s ancestors in the United States is not an example of aspiring immigrants complying with a cumbrous and Kafkaesque body of immigration regulation; it is an example of something close to the kind of extremely permissive immigration policy advanced in our time by certain libertarians …. I myself favor a more restrictive immigration policy than the one that was in place when Miller’s antecedents passed through Ellis Island, one that also is in some ways more restrictive than current practice and in some ways more liberal.” (11/11/26)
“As a graduate of St Andrews, I take a keen interest in its doings. Scotland’s oldest university has started a new tradition. Every winter day it feeds trees into a furnace in a disused paper mill, then pumps the hot water four miles down the road to warm its laboratories. It calls this sustainability. A more skeptical observer might call it an expensive way to set fire to forests and public funds at the same time.” (11/11/26)
“The ‘billionaire tax’ is officially dead. Voters rejected Proposition 40 by a wide margin, restoring hope for common-sense governance in the Golden State. This was a victory for economic growth, and jobs, and investment in the future. The United States has never had a wealth tax that would allow the government to seize what people had saved. Proposition 40 would have been the first. And it would have destroyed the startup culture that has made California’s economy the envy of the world. Voters understood that entrepreneurs would leave the state if Proposition 40 passed. Or they would sell their companies to pay the tax, sending stocks into freefall. As it is, Proposition 40 did plenty of damage simply by qualifying for the ballot. At least seven billionaires had already left the state by Election Day, with combined wealth of more than half a trillion dollars.” (11/10/26)
“Here’s a fun argument you can use to discredit anyone at any time. Start by calling them an arrogant fanatic with a totalizing ideology, someone who thinks they personally have solved all problems and can’t possibly learn from dissenting viewpoints. If they have friends who agree with them, they’re a cult who collectively work to shelter themselves from any dissenting viewpoint. Then your victim responds by presenting one hundred notarized affadavits describing times when they have engaged with their critics, spent years studying books by their critics to see what they could learn from them, and even changed their beliefs in response to criticism. Then you spring the trap: ‘Ah, but you cherry-picked critics who operate within your worldview, a sort of loyal opposition. You continue to dismiss and exclude genuine critics who challenge your smug assumptions.’ This always works.” (11/11/26)
