Source: Astral Codex Ten
by Scott Alexander
“Constraint consequentialists believe that you should try to do good things that improve the world, unless those break hard-and-fast rules (‘deontological bars). For example, you shouldn’t assassinate democratically-elected leaders, even very bad ones. Why not? Since bad leaders set bad policy, and bad policy can kill many thousands of people, wouldn’t it be for the greater good? Because there’s always one gun-owner who thinks any given leader’s policies are bad, so without the rule, every leader would face constant assassination attempts, probably some of them would succeed, and the nation would either crumble or degenerate into a security state.” (04/30/26)