Source: Antiwar.com
by Marc Sills
“Whoever controls a chokepoint has the obvious advantage of keeping it open to merchant transit, ideally under ‘freedom of navigation’ rules and norms, such as are enumerated in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) – which the US has not ratified. On the other side of the coin, the very definition of chokepoints implies that they can be closed off and blockaded by force – presumably given some alleged military necessity, legal or otherwise.” (03/03/25)