When Vaccines Are Mandated, Who Bears the Liability?

Source: Brownstone Institute
by Scott Morefield

“It’s one thing to recommend a medical intervention and even make the pitch that it’s better than the alternative, especially to those at-risk groups to whom the alternative is grim. If people then willingly ‘buy’ it, they are assuming their own risk after having studied all possible outcomes. You know, ‘informed consent’ and all that. But when you delve into force and coercion, you are morally, and you should be legally, responsible for anything negative that ensues. Sadly, right now we do not live in a sane nor a just world. The mandates have changed the liability calculus such that the party that does the forcing should bear the blame for adverse consequences.” (10/12/21)